In our Bucharest to Paris EV duel, the Audi S6 Avant e-tron beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 2300km route in 23h 12min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi S6 Avant e-tron needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi S6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 23h 12min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~418 kWh
- Distance: 2300km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi S6 Avant e-tron |
| Travel time |
23h 22min |
23h 12min |
| Charging time: |
1h 31min |
1h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY PADO Shopping Galerien (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi S6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (14 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 13% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi S6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi S6 Avant e-tron achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2300km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~418 kWh vs ~422 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons