In our Bucharest to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 43 minutes, completing the 1346km route in 13h 53min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 53min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~220 kWh
- Distance: 1346km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
13h 53min |
14h 36min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~242 kWh |
~243 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Lamačská cesta (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Prague
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (20 min, 19% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
B.C.S. (13 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1346km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 1h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~220 kWh vs ~230 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons