In our Bucharest to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 19 minutes, completing the 1809km route in 26h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 3min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 59min
- Energy: ~282 kWh
- Distance: 1809km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
26h 22min |
26h 3min |
| Charging time: |
2h 15min |
1h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~326 kWh |
~326 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 16% → 29%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (45 min, 13% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Główna (36 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (13 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 6:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 20% → 33%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (43 min, 18% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (36 min, 17% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 19-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1809km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 59min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~282 kWh vs ~295 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons