In our Bucharest to Riga EV duel, the VW ID.7 Pro S beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 36 minutes, completing the 1809km route in 25h 46min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance's 576km range doesn't beat the VW ID.7 Pro S's 567km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The VW ID.7 Pro S needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
VW ID.7 Pro S
- Total time: 25h 46min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 36min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1809km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID.7 Pro S |
| Travel time |
26h 22min |
25h 46min |
| Charging time: |
2h 15min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~326 kWh |
~327 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 16% → 29%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (45 min, 13% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Główna (36 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (13 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 6:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
VW ID.7 Pro S Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pensiunea Cristeşti (10 min, 29% → 38%)
-
Stop 2:
Maysternya Smaku (30 min, 13% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (27 min, 16% → 83%)
-
Stop 5:
Jono Dailidės (19 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the VW ID.7 Pro S Won
The VW ID.7 Pro S achieved a 36-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1809km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 36min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~295 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons