In our Bucharest to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 268 minutes, completing the 1809km route in 26h 3min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 3min (268 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 59min
- Energy: ~282 kWh
- Distance: 1809km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
MG MG4 64kWh |
| Travel time |
26h 3min |
30h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 59min |
5h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~326 kWh |
~345 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 20% → 33%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (43 min, 18% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (36 min, 17% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Cristian Sens Timisoara (10 min, 10% → 23%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (51 min, 11% → 87%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (46 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (28 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Handlowe (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
Słowackiego (22 min, 19% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen (25 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (34 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 10:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K (21 min, 21% → 68%)
-
Stop 13:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 268-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1809km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 59min vs 5h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~282 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons