In our Bucharest to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 AWD Performance 2025 by 34 minutes, completing the 1861km route in 21h 24min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 24min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1861km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 AWD Performance 2025 |
| Travel time |
21h 24min |
21h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~338 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (19 min, 36% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Badia Nuova Ovest (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Rome
XPENG G6 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (48 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (14 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 5:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 49% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (13 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over XPENG G6 AWD Performance 2025 on this 1861km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~365 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons