In our Bucharest to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 by 35 minutes, completing the 1861km route in 21h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 24min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1861km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
| Travel time |
21h 24min |
21h 59min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
1h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~335 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (19 min, 36% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Badia Nuova Ovest (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Rome
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (47 min, 20% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 26% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
Badia Nuova Ovest (14 min, 16% → 86%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 on this 1861km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 1h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~396 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons