In our Bucharest to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Performance beats the Vinfast VF9 by 35 minutes, completing the 1863km route in 22h 27min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 23, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Vinfast VF9's 475km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Performance's 411km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Performance
- Total time: 22h 27min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 12min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 1863km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
Vinfast VF9 |
| Travel time |
22h 27min |
23h 2min |
| Charging time: |
2h 12min |
2h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~335 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (45 min, 16% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (19 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (10 min, 13% → 52%)
- Arrival: Rome
Vinfast VF9 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (45 min, 27% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (23 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (21 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Barje Sever (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (18 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Autogrill Po Ovest (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model Y Performance Won
The Tesla Model Y Performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Vinfast VF9 on this 1863km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 12min vs 2h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~482 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons