In our Bucharest to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 72 minutes, completing the 2109km route in 30h 41min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 41min (72 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 28min
- Energy: ~344 kWh
- Distance: 2109km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
30h 41min |
31h 53min |
| Charging time: |
2h 28min |
3h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~386 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 16% → 29%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (45 min, 13% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Główna (40 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (22 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (10 min, 21% → 62%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland Strada Nicu Enea (54 min, 12% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
LuxWash & LuxMarket (32 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
King Cross Leopolis (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Główna (12 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Grzybowa (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
Circle K Purvciems (14 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 11:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 72-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 2109km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 28min vs 3h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~344 kWh vs ~349 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons