In our Bucharest to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 52 minutes, completing the 1061km route in 11h 12min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 12min (52 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 26min
- Energy: ~173 kWh
- Distance: 1061km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 12min |
12h 4min |
| Charging time: |
26min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~191 kWh |
~191 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (21 min, 13% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Giarmata Sens Arad (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (16 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 52-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1061km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 26min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~173 kWh vs ~175 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons