In our Bucharest to Vienna EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 25 minutes, completing the 1064km route in 12h 14min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 14min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 27min
- Energy: ~168 kWh
- Distance: 1064km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 39min |
12h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~191 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrom Maracineni (10 min, 62% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (16 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV DN69 (25 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Páty Nord (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Győr (13 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (27 min, 21% → 87%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV DN69 (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 25-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1064km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 27min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~168 kWh vs ~180 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons