In our Bucharest to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 1460km route in 23h 27min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 27min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 43min
- Energy: ~227 kWh
- Distance: 1460km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 38min |
23h 27min |
| Charging time: |
1h 53min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~263 kWh |
~263 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 16% → 29%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (51 min, 13% → 84%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Kolejowa (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Fikoland (30 min, 21% → 89%)
-
Stop 5:
Belorusneft Tankstelle 17 (12 min, 10% → 21%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 20% → 33%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (53 min, 18% → 89%)
-
Stop 3:
Fikoland (29 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
Belorusneft Tankstelle 17 (11 min, 10% → 20%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1460km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 43min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~227 kWh vs ~238 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons