In our Bucharest to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 25 minutes, completing the 1187km route in 18h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Avant e-tron's 478km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 18h 4min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~186 kWh
- Distance: 1187km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
18h 4min |
18h 29min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~214 kWh |
~214 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 12% → 28%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (54 min, 12% → 87%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Legionów (12 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland Sucedava (10 min, 26% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (57 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Legionów (11 min, 24% → 64%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron achieved a 25-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1187km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~186 kWh vs ~218 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons