In our Bucharest to Warsaw EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 49 minutes, completing the 1279km route in 19h 8min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 19h 8min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 12min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1279km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 57min |
19h 8min |
| Charging time: |
2h 51min |
2h 12min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~229 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrom Maracineni (10 min, 62% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (36 min, 12% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (46 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (28 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Handlowe (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Witolda (20 min, 18% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Główna (21 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (20 min, 21% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (31 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Witolda (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 49-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1279km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 12min vs 2h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~217 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons