In our Bucharest to Warsaw EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the SsangYong Korando e-Motion by 115 minutes, completing the 1272km route in 18h 53min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The SsangYong Korando e-Motion's 271km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 18h 53min (115 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 57min
- Energy: ~249 kWh
- Distance: 1272km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #1 Pro |
SsangYong Korando e-Motion |
| Travel time |
18h 53min |
20h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 57min |
3h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~229 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Pitesti 3 (10 min, 75% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (17 min, 16% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (32 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (27 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Witolda (21 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
SsangYong Korando e-Motion Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrom Maracineni (17 min, 57% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (Truck) (52 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (50 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (33 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Handlowe (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Witolda (31 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Główna (29 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 115-minute advantage over SsangYong Korando e-Motion on this 1272km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 57min vs 3h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~249 kWh vs ~263 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons