In our Budapest to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 33 minutes, completing the 858km route in 8h 23min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 23min (33 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~140 kWh
- Distance: 858km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 23min |
8h 56min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
49min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~155 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Hansastraße (10 min, 18% → 49%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ladná směr Brno (10 min, 21% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Burger King Kutnohorská (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Esso Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 33-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 858km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~140 kWh vs ~142 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons