In our Budapest to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 23 minutes, completing the 1067km route in 10h 55min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 55min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~196 kWh
- Distance: 1067km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
10h 55min |
11h 18min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Burger King (10 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Migrol (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (10 min, 15% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Burger King (10 min, 15% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (11 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Stegen (11 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 23-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1067km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons