In our Budapest to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range AWD by 56 minutes, completing the 2471km route in 25h 15min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 15min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~403 kWh
- Distance: 2471km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range AWD |
| Travel time |
25h 15min |
26h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
2h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~445 kWh |
~447 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Center Ljubljana (14 min, 14% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Roadhouse (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gigean Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Ford Capri Extended Range AWD Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tepanje West (Maribor - Celje) (10 min, 18% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 24% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (18 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Brescia Est (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (22 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Nabrigas (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
ANDGO (15 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Vila Sana (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (19 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range AWD on this 2471km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 2h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~403 kWh vs ~424 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons