In our Budapest to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Polestar 2 Standard Range by 58 minutes, completing the 2471km route in 25h 15min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 15min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~403 kWh
- Distance: 2471km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Polestar 2 Standard Range |
| Travel time |
25h 15min |
26h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~445 kWh |
~445 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Center Ljubljana (14 min, 14% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Roadhouse (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gigean Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Polestar 2 Standard Range Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tepanje West (Maribor - Celje) (13 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (16 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (23 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Rue John Mac Adam (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Gasparets (14 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (18 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 9:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Ariza Norte (10 min, 17% → 58%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over Polestar 2 Standard Range on this 2471km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~403 kWh vs ~435 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons