In our Budapest to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW iX1 eDrive20 by 82 minutes, completing the 1846km route in 21h 39min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 39min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~301 kWh
- Distance: 1846km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW iX1 eDrive20 |
| Travel time |
21h 39min |
23h 1min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~332 kWh |
~332 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 18% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (12 min, 16% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
BMW iX1 eDrive20 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ladná směr Brno (13 min, 23% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Sarrasaniparkplatz (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Am Kahlberg Ost (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (13 min, 14% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Importgatan (17 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 11:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over BMW iX1 eDrive20 on this 1846km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~301 kWh vs ~311 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons