In our Budapest to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Standard Range by 94 minutes, completing the 1479km route in 14h 2min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 2min (94 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~241 kWh
- Distance: 1479km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Standard Range |
| Travel time |
14h 2min |
15h 36min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
2h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (14 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Ford Capri Standard Range Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Steinhäusl (12 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Donautal Ost (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Bonfelder Straße (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Tank & Rast Raststätte Pfalz (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (28 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire Reims Champagne Nord (20 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 94-minute advantage over Ford Capri Standard Range on this 1479km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 2h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~241 kWh vs ~245 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons