In our Budapest to Paris EV duel, the Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range beats the Citroën ë-C4 by 111 minutes, completing the 1486km route in 14h 35min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range
- Total time: 14h 35min (111 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~238 kWh
- Distance: 1486km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Citroën ë-C4 |
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range |
| Travel time |
16h 26min |
14h 35min |
| Charging time: |
2h 54min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~267 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Citroën ë-C4 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Hadikgasse (10 min, 11% → 38%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Roggendorf (10 min, 11% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 12% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AVIA (16 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Total Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohof Schwabach West (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
BFS Business Fleet Services (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
ATU (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
REWE (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 11:
Shell Tankstelle Südstraße (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (20 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Aire de Gueux (21 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Paris
Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Salzburger Straße (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle Südstraße (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (15 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range Won
The Ford Explorer Elektro Extended Range achieved a 111-minute advantage over Citroën ë-C4 on this 1486km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 2h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~238 kWh vs ~253 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons