In our Budapest to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 25 minutes, completing the 1359km route in 16h 36min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 36min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~222 kWh
- Distance: 1359km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 36min |
17h 1min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~245 kWh |
~244 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Xland (12 min, 32% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Amic (10 min, 22% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 14% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (16 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 25-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1359km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 1h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~222 kWh vs ~244 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons