In our Budapest to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 32 minutes, completing the 1360km route in 17h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 0min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~250 kWh
- Distance: 1360km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
17h 0min |
17h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~245 kWh |
~244 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Amic (10 min, 24% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (27 min, 11% → 86%)
-
Stop 4:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Riga
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Biedronka Wiejska (16 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (28 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (36 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1360km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons