In our Budapest to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 67 minutes, completing the 1199km route in 11h 49min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 49min (67 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~187 kWh
- Distance: 1199km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
11h 49min |
12h 56min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~216 kWh |
~216 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tepanje West (Maribor - Celje) (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrol Murska Sobota sever (18 min, 12% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Porsche Center Ljubljana (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Adige Ovest (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 67-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1199km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~187 kWh vs ~191 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons