In our Budapest to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 40 minutes, completing the 1200km route in 12h 0min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 0min (40 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~220 kWh
- Distance: 1200km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 0min |
12h 40min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~216 kWh |
~216 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrol Arnovski Gozd (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Petrol Murska Sobota sever (13 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Porsche Center Ljubljana (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Adige Ovest (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 40-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1200km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons