In our Budapest to Rome EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Kangoo E-Tech by 112 minutes, completing the 1204km route in 12h 21min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 12h 21min (112 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 9min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 1204km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Kangoo E-Tech |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
14h 13min |
12h 21min |
| Charging time: |
2h 43min |
1h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~217 kWh |
~219 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Kangoo E-Tech Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger KFC (12 min, 51% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Pince-Sever (13 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Maribor zahod (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Four Points by Sheraton (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Gonars Nord (15 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 10:
Giove Ovest (13 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tepanje West (Maribor - Celje) (10 min, 25% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 23% → 32%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (14 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Adige Ovest (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (11 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 112-minute advantage over Renault Kangoo E-Tech on this 1204km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 9min vs 2h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~209 kWh vs ~244 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons