In our Budapest to Rome EV duel, the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 beats the Tesla Model 3 Long-Range by 17 minutes, completing the 1199km route in 11h 53min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 Long-Range's 448km range doesn't beat the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025's 432km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025
- Total time: 11h 53min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~255 kWh
- Distance: 1199km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range |
| Travel time |
11h 53min |
12h 10min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
47min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~216 kWh |
~216 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tepanje West (Maribor - Celje) (10 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 19% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Badia Nuova Ovest (15 min, 11% → 86%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model 3 Long-Range Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tepanje West (Maribor - Celje) (11 min, 18% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (13 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (12 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Won
The XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 achieved a 17-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Long-Range on this 1199km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons