In our Copenhagen to Riga EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 28 minutes, completing the 1306km route in 20h 9min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 20h 9min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 39min
- Energy: ~256 kWh
- Distance: 1306km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
20h 37min |
20h 9min |
| Charging time: |
2h 0min |
1h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~235 kWh |
~237 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Charge Kaufhaus Stolz (19 min, 14% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Wyszogóra Wschód (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka 11 Listopada (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Volvo Drywa (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Lidl (36 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Charge Kaufhaus Stolz (13 min, 16% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Wyszogóra Wschód (12 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka 11 Listopada (23 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
Lidl (31 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Vilniaus (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 28-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1306km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 39min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons