In our Copenhagen to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 101 minutes, completing the 1883km route in 20h 49min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 49min (101 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~293 kWh
- Distance: 1883km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 49min |
22h 30min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
2h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~339 kWh |
~340 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Affi (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 15% → 61%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 58% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Wittstock (12 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's - Autohof Brück (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Hofer (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Eni Paganella Ovest (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Electra Mantova Village (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 11:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 101-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1883km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 2h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~293 kWh vs ~299 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons