In our Copenhagen to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 28 minutes, completing the 2053km route in 23h 2min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 2min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~335 kWh
- Distance: 2053km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 2min |
23h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 21min |
1h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~370 kWh |
~371 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mercedes Benz Airport Center (13 min, 16% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Kbelská (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Bergstraße (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Karlov (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 2053km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 1h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~335 kWh vs ~368 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons