In our Copenhagen to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 104 minutes, completing the 2053km route in 23h 2min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 2min (104 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~335 kWh
- Distance: 2053km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
23h 2min |
24h 46min |
| Charging time: |
1h 21min |
2h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~370 kWh |
~372 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mercedes Benz Airport Center (13 min, 16% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Kbelská (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Copenhagen (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 61% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Wittstock (15 min, 21% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
SachsenEnergie City Center (11 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Kardausova DC (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
OC Karlov (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Bory Mall (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Bábolna (15 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (26 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV smer Beograd (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 11:
JP Putevi Srbije (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 12:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 104-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 2053km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 2h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~335 kWh vs ~339 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons