In our Dublin to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 44 minutes, completing the 1088km route in 15h 7min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 7min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 32min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 1088km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
15h 7min |
15h 51min |
| Charging time: |
32min |
1h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~196 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Watford Gap Services Southbound (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Maidstone (12 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Menai Science Park (10 min, 58% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Birmingham Armada (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Maidstone services (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Lidl Avenue Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (13 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Hazeldonk-Oost (10 min, 16% → 49%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1088km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 32min vs 1h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons