In our Dublin to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 74 minutes, completing the 1725km route in 20h 3min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 3min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~282 kWh
- Distance: 1725km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
20h 3min |
21h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
1h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~311 kWh |
~298 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Roadchef Watford Gap Northbound (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Maidstone (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
P+R Gentbrugge I (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
A2 Bottrop Süd (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Birmingham Armada (10 min, 14% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Maidstone services (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Lidl Avenue Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Het Goor (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
A2 Bottrop Süd (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Irxleben (14 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 74-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1725km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 1h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~282 kWh vs ~319 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons