In our Dublin to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 135 minutes, completing the 2168km route in 24h 32min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 32min (135 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~354 kWh
- Distance: 2168km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
24h 32min |
26h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 21min |
3h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~390 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Roadchef Watford Gap Northbound (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Maidstone (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (10 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
EWE Go McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Ansfelden Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Watford Gap Services Southbound (10 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Newport Pagnell Services Southbound (14 min, 19% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Eurotunnel (14 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Hotel Weinebrugge (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (23 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Medenbach West (18 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (30 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle (31 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
solarcap Ladepark (18 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 135-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2168km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 3h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~354 kWh vs ~408 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons