In our Dublin to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 76 minutes, completing the 2393km route in 28h 45min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 28h 45min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~372 kWh
- Distance: 2393km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
28h 45min |
30h 1min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
1h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~431 kWh |
~425 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Dublin Port (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Moto Toddington Southbound (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Maidstone (11 min, 31% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Oud-Turnhout Zuid (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Uno-X Danmark (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Birmingham Armada (17 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Maidstone (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Oostendse Baan (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Het Goor (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Münsterland Ost (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
KFC (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (13 min, 20% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 10:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 2393km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~372 kWh vs ~423 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons