In our Dublin to Paris EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 25 minutes, completing the 1013km route in 14h 53min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 14h 53min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~160 kWh
- Distance: 1013km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 18min |
14h 53min |
| Charging time: |
1h 34min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~182 kWh |
~182 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Menai Science Park (14 min, 52% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Village Hotel (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Maidstone services (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Holiday Inn Calais (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de la Baie de Somme (26 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Menai Science Park (10 min, 54% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
Birmingham Armada (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Moto Toddington Southbound (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Maidstone (22 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de la Baie de Somme (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 25-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1013km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 1h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~160 kWh vs ~172 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons