In our Dublin to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Lotus Eletre by 69 minutes, completing the 1809km route in 21h 34min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 34min (69 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~282 kWh
- Distance: 1809km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Lotus Eletre |
| Travel time |
21h 34min |
22h 43min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~326 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Dublin Port (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Moto Toddington Southbound (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Maidstone (11 min, 31% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Oud-Turnhout Zuid (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
SVG Autohof Elsinger Höhe (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
EnBW Schnellladepark Rüdersdorf (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Prague
Lotus Eletre Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electric Highway Rugby Services (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Maidstone (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Oostendse Baan (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Oud-Turnhout Zuid (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
dm-drogerie markt / E center Paschmann (10 min, 15% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Autohof Elsinger Höhe (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Laucha (10 min, 16% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Zschopauer Straße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 69-minute advantage over Lotus Eletre on this 1809km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~282 kWh vs ~407 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons