In our Dublin to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 117 minutes, completing the 2066km route in 23h 14min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 14min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~322 kWh
- Distance: 2066km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
23h 14min |
25h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~372 kWh |
~367 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Dublin Port (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Moto Toddington Southbound (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Süd (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Birmingham Armada (10 min, 14% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Maidstone services (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Lidl Avenue Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Total Zolder Zuid (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Weiskirchen Süd (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Autohof Gremsdorf (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 11:
JET Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 117-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2066km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~322 kWh vs ~382 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons