In our Dublin to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 153 minutes, completing the 2186km route in 25h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 24min (153 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~401 kWh
- Distance: 2186km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
25h 24min |
27h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
3h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~393 kWh |
~396 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Watford Gap Services Southbound (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Village Hotel (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Het Goor (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Vellern Süd (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Lądek (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Watford Gap Services Southbound (10 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Newport Pagnell Services Southbound (14 min, 19% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Eurotunnel (14 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Hotel Weinebrugge (21 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (33 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Bantorf (18 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (15 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (29 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen A2 MOP Krzyżowniki (56 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 153-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2186km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 3h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~401 kWh vs ~411 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons