In our Dublin to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron by 77 minutes, completing the 2253km route in 25h 12min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 12min (77 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~351 kWh
- Distance: 2253km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
25h 12min |
26h 29min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~406 kWh |
~401 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Dublin Port (10 min, 99% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Moto Toddington Southbound (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Raststation Trieben (10 min, 12% → 60%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi Q6 e-tron Route
- Start: Dublin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Village Hotel (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (10 min, 21% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Channel Gateway (12 min, 16% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OBI Markt (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Seidl Confiserie (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 77-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron on this 2253km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~351 kWh vs ~424 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons