In our Hamburg to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 7 minutes, completing the 733km route in 8h 17min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 8h 17min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~116 kWh
- Distance: 733km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
8h 24min |
8h 17min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
44min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~132 kWh |
~132 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Hamburg (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 23% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Herkules E-Center (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastanlage Coburger Forst West (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Weißer Graben West (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Pendlerparkplatz Am Limes (10 min, 13% → 42%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Hamburg (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 27% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Weißer Graben West (18 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 7-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 733km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~116 kWh vs ~124 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons