In our Hamburg to Munich EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 10 minutes, completing the 734km route in 8h 7min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 8h 7min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~144 kWh
- Distance: 734km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
8h 17min |
8h 7min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
34min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~132 kWh |
~132 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Hamburg (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 27% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Lidl (10 min, 14% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
REWE (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Munich
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Hamburg (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 29% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Weißer Graben West (14 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 10-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 734km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons