In our Helsinki to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 50 minutes, completing the 2088km route in 27h 27min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 27min (50 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 22min
- Energy: ~375 kWh
- Distance: 2088km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
27h 27min |
28h 17min |
| Charging time: |
2h 22min |
3h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~376 kWh |
~377 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 15% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K (78 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Gutenbergstraße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 22% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Purvciems (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Girelė (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Vilniaus (40 min, 10% → 100%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Południe (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Żnin Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Chociszewo (11 min, 21% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 12:
A.T.U (11 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 13:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 50-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 2088km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 22min vs 3h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons