In our Helsinki to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 2346km route in 29h 10min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 10min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 32min
- Energy: ~365 kWh
- Distance: 2346km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
29h 20min |
29h 10min |
| Charging time: |
1h 45min |
1h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~422 kWh |
~422 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (35 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohof Schwabach West (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (28 min, 15% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Autohof Brück (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
dm-drogerie markt (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2346km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 32min vs 1h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~365 kWh vs ~383 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons