In our Helsinki to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 8 minutes, completing the 1689km route in 22h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 22h 58min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 26min
- Energy: ~266 kWh
- Distance: 1689km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
22h 58min |
23h 6min |
| Charging time: |
2h 26min |
2h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~304 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Fabryczna (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Signalbau (17 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (13 min, 16% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (20 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (19 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Ekoen Atrium Reduta (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Górski (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
Signalbau (16 min, 12% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1689km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~266 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons