In our Helsinki to Oslo EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 26 minutes, completing the 1008km route in 24h 12min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 24h 12min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 27min
- Energy: ~160 kWh
- Distance: 1008km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
24h 38min |
24h 12min |
| Charging time: |
1h 56min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ykkös Cafe (10 min, 59% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (48 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 4:
IKEA (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Boglundsängen (17 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Preem Grums (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (11 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ykkös Cafe (10 min, 55% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OKQ8 Årstagatan (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 26-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1008km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 27min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~160 kWh vs ~223 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons