In our Helsinki to Oslo EV duel, the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 7 minutes, completing the 1006km route in 24h 5min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge
- Total time: 24h 5min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~166 kWh
- Distance: 1006km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
24h 12min |
24h 5min |
| Charging time: |
1h 27min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ykkös Cafe (10 min, 55% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OKQ8 Årstagatan (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
K-Supermarket (10 min, 51% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (30 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K Västhaga (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Preem Grums (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Won
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge achieved a 7-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1006km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons