In our Helsinki to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 183 minutes, completing the 2477km route in 30h 14min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 14min (183 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 48min
- Energy: ~404 kWh
- Distance: 2477km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
30h 14min |
33h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 48min |
4h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~446 kWh |
~449 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (35 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Remscheid West (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 38% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (24 min, 14% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K (80 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka (11 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Zachód (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Dopiewiec (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 10:
Ehrenberg West (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Bierset (16 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (21 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 183-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 2477km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 48min vs 4h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~404 kWh vs ~610 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons