In our Helsinki to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 27 minutes, completing the 1679km route in 21h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 47min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1679km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 47min |
22h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 2min |
1h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Circle K (17 min, 26% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
ALDI (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Helsinki (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 41% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 27% → 82%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Fabryczna (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Nowostawy (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Citronex (20 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 27-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1679km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 1h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons